By Jamie Lackritz, Senior Client Services Manager at Seabright School and Therapy Staffing
There is no single “best” way to deliver special education services.
What works for one district, school, or student may not work for another. Today’s schools are balancing increasingly complex student needs with staffing shortages, growing caseloads, compliance requirements, and limited resources.
At the same time, schools are having new conversations about how to modernize special education service delivery. Technology, virtual services, collaborative models, and flexible staffing approaches are giving schools more options. But the goal should not be adopting something new simply because it is new.
The most successful special education programs are often those that remain flexible, build strong teams, and match services to the individual needs of students.
Moving Beyond a One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Special Education
Schools today often use a combination of service delivery models, including:
Inclusion and push-in services, where students receive support within the general education classroom.
Pull-out or resource services, which provide targeted instruction or therapy individually or in small groups.
Self-contained or specialized classrooms for students requiring more intensive support.
Collaborative models, where specialists work closely with teachers, families, and other members of the educational team.
Virtual and hybrid services, which can expand access to specialized professionals when onsite providers are difficult to find.
Each model has a place.
The strongest programs recognize that these models are tools, not rigid structures. The right approach depends on the student, the services required, and the resources available.
A district may have a strong inclusion model but struggle to provide specialized therapy consistently. Another may have experienced special education teachers but difficulty filling related service positions. A third may have access to local providers in some disciplines but not others.
The service delivery model has to account for those realities.
Modernizing special education can mean introducing new approaches, but it can also mean taking a closer look at how existing services are organized and where additional flexibility could help.
What Really Works in Special Education?
Put Individual Student Needs First
A service model should be based on a student’s IEP, goals, abilities, and educational environment, not simply what is easiest to staff or schedule.
This requires teams to look at the whole school day. Where does the student learn best? What type of support is required? When should specialized instruction or therapy occur? Which services need to happen individually, and which can be integrated into the classroom?
Maintaining flexibility allows teams to adjust services as students progress and their needs change.
A model that works well at the beginning of the school year may need to be adjusted later. Student needs change. Schedules change. Staffing changes. New information becomes available.
Strong special education programs leave room to respond.
Prioritize Collaboration
Successful special education programs depend on communication between special education teachers, general education teachers, related service providers, administrators, paraprofessionals, and families.
When teams collaborate consistently, strategies can be reinforced throughout the student’s school day rather than only during designated instructional or therapy sessions.
A speech-language pathologist may identify communication strategies that can also be reinforced by classroom staff. An occupational therapist may recommend classroom supports that help a student participate more independently. A special education teacher may identify a learning strategy that needs to carry over into other parts of the school day.
These connections require time, communication, and the right professionals to be part of the team.
Recognize That Push-In and Pull-Out Both Have Value
The conversation around push-in versus pull-out services can sometimes become unnecessarily divided.
Push-in services allow students to receive support in their natural learning environment and promote inclusion and collaboration. Pull-out services can provide a quieter, more focused setting for targeted instruction, therapy, assessments, or interventions.
For many students, a thoughtful combination of both can be the most effective approach.
The question is when each approach makes sense for a particular student and service.
There may be times when a student benefits from receiving therapy in the classroom alongside peers. There may also be times when focused individual or small-group support is appropriate.
Schools need the flexibility to make those decisions based on student needs and the recommendations of the educational team.
Build Flexibility into Special Education Staffing
Even the best service delivery model will struggle without qualified professionals to implement it.
Staffing shortages in special education and related services continue to challenge schools, often resulting in larger caseloads and difficulty maintaining consistent services. When a district cannot fill a special education teacher, speech-language pathologist, occupational therapist, physical therapist, school psychologist, or other specialized position, existing team members may have to absorb additional responsibilities.
Schedules become harder to manage. Caseloads can grow. Services can become more difficult to coordinate.
Districts may need to consider a combination of permanent employees, contracted professionals, and virtual providers to maintain continuity.
Permanent employees may provide the long-term consistency a school needs. Contract professionals can provide additional capacity when vacancies or caseload increases create immediate pressure. Virtual providers can help schools access specialized professionals when local recruitment is difficult.
These options can work together.
The staffing strategy should support the service model rather than forcing the service model to conform to whatever staffing happens to be available.
Consider Virtual and Hybrid Services Carefully
Virtual and hybrid services have become an increasingly practical option for schools facing geographic and staffing challenges.
They can expand access to specialized professionals when onsite providers are difficult to find, particularly for certain related services or specialized areas of expertise.
While they aren't appropriate for every situation, they can expand access when supported by the right technology, communication, and onsite resources.
The key is to evaluate virtual service delivery as part of the broader model rather than treating it as a replacement for every onsite service.
Schools should consider the student's needs, the type of service being provided, the availability of onsite support, technology requirements, communication expectations, and how the provider will collaborate with the rest of the educational team.
When those pieces are in place, virtual services can give districts another way to maintain access to qualified professionals.
Check out our Virtual Hiring Guide
The Staffing Model Has to Support the Service Model
One of the practical realities of special education is that service delivery decisions and staffing decisions are closely connected.
A district may determine that a student population would benefit from a particular mix of classroom-based services, targeted interventions, and related therapies. The next question is whether the district has the professionals and capacity to deliver those services consistently.
That is where workforce planning becomes part of special education planning.
District leaders may need to look at current vacancies, projected enrollment, caseloads, turnover, hard-to-fill disciplines, geographic challenges, and the availability of specialized professionals in the local market.
They also need to consider what happens when a provider goes on leave or a position remains open longer than expected.
A flexible staffing strategy can give schools options when those situations arise.
For some districts, that may mean using contracted professionals to address a vacancy while continuing to recruit for a permanent employee. For others, it may mean combining onsite and virtual providers. In some situations, additional temporary staffing may help protect existing teams from taking on unsustainable caseloads.
How Seabright Supports Flexible Special Education Staffing
At Seabright School and Therapy Staffing, we understand that every school has its own staffing realities.
A district may need an experienced special education teacher for a full school year. Another may need a related service provider to address a vacancy or growing caseload. Another may be exploring virtual or hybrid options because qualified professionals are difficult to find locally.
The staffing solution needs to start with the school.
Seabright takes a relationship-driven approach to understanding those needs and connecting schools with qualified education and therapy professionals who fit the setting, role, and requirements.
That starts with listening.
Understanding the school's environment, the position, the student population, the team's needs, and the challenges behind the opening helps create a more thoughtful staffing process. It also gives districts a partner they can return to when circumstances change.
This approach reflects Seabright’s focus on real school partnership and full-year support. The goal is to work alongside school teams and provide support throughout the staffing relationship.
For schools managing vacancies, caseload pressure, or changing student needs, that relationship can provide another layer of flexibility.
Flexibility Is Key to Effective Special Education Service Delivery
There is no universal service delivery model that works for every school, district, or student.
Push-in can support inclusion and collaboration. Pull-out can provide focused instruction and therapy. Specialized classrooms can offer more intensive support when needed, while virtual and hybrid services can help schools access professionals when local options are limited.
The common thread is flexibility.
Successful special education programs depend on the right services, the right professionals, and the ability to adapt as needs change. For school leaders, that means looking at how service delivery and staffing work together and considering where additional support may be needed.
The question is not simply which model a school uses. It is whether the model gives the team the flexibility and staffing support needed to meet students' needs.
Need additional special education staffing support? Seabright School and Therapy Staffing can help connect your school with qualified education and therapy professionals. Contact Seabright to discuss your staffing needs today!
About the Author
Jamie Lackritz is a Client Services Manager at Seabright School and Therapy Staffing with 13 years of experience in the staffing industry. She has two daughters, ages 10 & 8, and enjoys traveling, time with family, and a fun day at the beach!
DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX MONTHLY